About Me

Name:Rick
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 
[Click to edit me]

Should a Dem win the presidency, it is not only we Americans who need to look out!

It will be the Iranians who need to look out too!

Once the Oval Office becomes Barrack's or Hillary's, the Iranians will need to look out!  One of these two will want to make GWB look an idiot, and to do this, he or she will have to make Iran look like Vietnam!

He or she will take troops, doing God's work in Iraq regardless of what the media are telling you, from Iraq and post them in Iran after he or she has wiped the desert with Iranian blood.  The people will not be allowed to VOTE at all because from the dim, liberal perspective, these people won't be ABLE to make decisions for themselves.

BOTH of these candidates look to REMOVE medical decisions from ALL of us in the U.S.  So, he/she will be under the impression that ALL people are too dumb to make decisions for themselves.  So, he/she will be using this strawman as a motivation to DENY the conquered Iranians a chance to vote for themselves.

The Iranians will make a mess of this by REVOLTING against the conquerors, and the WHOLE Middle East will turn into a cauldron of fire!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama is the Anti-Hillary to the Hillary establishment

What is SO funny to see in the media is Hillary Clinton. 

For years, more than likely, she has painted herself as the anti-establishment candidate.  In becoming the "anti-establishment" candidate in her OWN mind, she has become the establishment candidate among her constituency, and ALL Obama needs to do to win the nomination is to continue reminding everyone that Obama is NOT Hillary and what Hillary would take to the White House were she to win it all.

She has painted herself into a corner in effect.  EVERYTHING she does is to appear anti-establishment among her anti-establishment democrats makes her appear to be the establishment candidate.  She is to blame for this.

What did she do to become this?  Well, first, she voted FOR it before she stopped supporting it.  The war, that is.  In an effort to make herself into a political chameleon she voted against her STRONGEST constituency (the anti-war nuts) back in '02.  She SUPPORTED the president's efforts to give it BACK to the people who are the most responsible for the 9/11 Attacks before she turned into the political chameleon she has become since this vote.

At a debate a few months back, she forgot that she was ON VIDEO and contradicted herself within two minutes right in FRONT of our faces, and YouTube is FILLED with vids of this contradiction, and many people's senses of humor have added to the video to emphasize her inablity to be honest with anyone.  Again, she supported it BEFORE she neglected it: the right of illegal aliens to have access to legal driver's licenses.

The LATEST issue is that she has dumped her highest level hispanic advisor in support of a replacement who is a black.  Both are women.  Why do this?  Well, this is because Obama is whipping her in the latest rounds of primaries and caucuses.  It is the blacks who have abandoned Hillary.  So she canned her hispanic advisor and hired a black advisor to "help" her get back in favor of the blacks who seem to have abandoned her.

All her political life, Hillary has painted herself as "anti-establishment" with the SAME liberal anti-establishment brush ALL liberals like to use to paint themselves but NOW she is being out-anti-established by Obama. 

As stated earlier, she is DOOMED.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Once the mostly-Catholic Hispanics realize that Shrillary is pro-abortion, they're going to drop her like a hot potato!

The Clinton, Inc. organization gave the blacks in the party the heave-ho when Shrillary explained that it is LBJ, not MLK, who should be credited for civil rights laws because it was HE who had to SIGN the bills that the democrats in the congress were less willing than the republicans to pass the laws, research the votes for this if you want to argue with me.  A greater percentage of republicans supported this effort than the dims.

Her supporters like to state that it's either vote for her and have babies killed or vote for the republicans who want the illegals thrown OUT of the contry.  This is rubbish.  My suspicion is that they are more likely to STAY HOME once they realize, via a debate or an advertisement from the republican candidate, that she has NO problem with the murder of innocent children en utero.

The dims (AKA the press) liked explaining to us that no conservatives are going to support someone like Rudy should he get the nomination due to him being, in the past, someone who supports appointing anti-constructionist judges to the SCOTUS.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Another Point About the New Reagan!

The media don't WANT us conservatives to find the "new" Reagan because they HATED the OLD Reagan.  Had they known that Jimma was gonna lose in '80, they would have shredded Reagan to a pulp.  They are painting McCain, at the moment, to look like Reagan so that we "can feel like we are participating," but we honest conservatives know this isn't the case.

You can throw Romney and Huckabee out the window.  Neither of them is CTTC (Conservative To The Core), and the media will tell you that there is NO ONE who fits the conservative mold in THIS election.  Heck, they told us two-weeks into the first year of his administration that GWB was no conservative, and that we conservatives in Florida who went to the polls on the evening of November 2, 2000 to VOTE for Bush to make sure the country heard OUR voices didn't ELECT a conservative.

Well, we did the best we could, regardless. 

The saddest thing is that Hollywood, of ALL places, MAY be producing the conservatives we need!  First, there was Reagan, whom the media dismissed as a "cowboy."  Now, we have Thompson who has worked in Hollywood.  Had Lucas cast GWB to play the part of Darth Vader in Star Wars, then the media would have a CASE!!!  *laughter*
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Mao Carved, And People Starved

We will be hearing from Dims about how "Bush Lied, People Died" for DECADES-to-come.

Well, here's a little rhyme that we can throw back in their faces, and the expression this rhyme receives from its recipient ought to be able to tell you if your target KNOWS any world history.

Mao Carved, And People Starved."

Back in the '50s and '60s, while Mao ruled the communist party in China, he carved up ALL the privately-owned companies onto which he could get his hands and gave them to the people!  On the surface, this could be painted as the actions of a "benevolent dictator" who is most concerned with his subjects due to him not wanting to see the money his country is able to produce going only to a single class of people: business owners.  Communism doesn't work THAT way!  *grin*  He needs to please as many of the people as he can with the least he can.

He does this by dissolving ownership of ALL corporations and turning the companies' land and hardware over to the people who live around the lands formerly owned by the company.  All he needs to do this is some Stooge soldiers, rifles, ammunitioin, and a community of people dumb enough to believe that they can produce a product of equal quality - they can't.  Just remember all the starvation in China in the '50s and the '60s.

Oh, well.  The "Mao carved, and people starved" idea was the issue this tiny column is to cover.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sen. Shrillary's campaign is circling-the-drain

Well, it has FINALLY come to this!

You can tell that Sen. Clinton's campaign is circling-the-drain because NONE of them will address the issue of her double-speak!  She has embraced the SAME double-speak that sank Sen. Kerry's campaign back in '04 when he said,

"I voted for it before I voted against it."

No one likes a schill, Senators Clinton and Kerry.  Granted, what Sen Shrillary said can't be made into a campaign slogan as easily as what Sen. Kerry said can, but we have YouTube now, and we don't need to watch the 1830 news to get the LATEST slogans from our candidates because, more than likely, these candidates have already posted some semblance of them on the site.  So long, commercial TV!  *laughter*

Oh!  She knows that her campaign is in-the-toilet because she is no longer addressing the issue!  Since she knows that she has said too much already, she knows that she is likely only to dig the hole deeper should she say anything more.  The media are stumbling over themselves to lend her some sand to FILL the hole she has dug or provide her a path out the corner into which she has painted herself!  Choose your metaphore!  Both work!

Again, we heard her "loyal" husband throwing out a strawman about her planting questions at debates.  It is the truth, but it is a ruse, also, to get your attention off the scars she suffered from the debate some weeks ago.  She hopes and prays - to whom?  Beats me! - that you will have forgotten about her Kerryesque '04 double-speak by the time you get to the voting booth in November '08.

It dawned on my tiny brain this morning!  Shrillary is triangulating, folks!  She voted FOR the war (in that Senate vote) before she "voted" against it with her hyperbole since.  She would have voted against it had she known that victory would be coming SO soon!  *laughter*  She triangulated, based on the performance of past presidents in times-of-war: LBJ and RMN that we would have our @sses handed to us in a matter of years, and she would be able to surf into the White House while riding a wave of political discontent, much like RMN did in '68.

It was "brilliant strateegery," if you will!  Were things to work, as she suspected, then she would tell everyone,

"Hey!  Look!  We are Americans!  We're supposed to support what our CiC says, regardless of our political leanings!"

Now, Bush is making her EAT her words and her "vote" with these victories in the Middle East.  The coup de gras will be the unveiling of OBL in a matter of months, and we will be told by the administration that the military "lost him" in the shuffle when the poo hit the fan back in '02-'05.  You will see!  Go ahead!  Call me names now!  If you think Billy Bob telling the world,

"I did not have sexual relations with that woman - Miss Lewinsky..." deserved an Oscar, wait until you see GWB with his perenial poo-eating-grin on his face tell everyone,

"Osama?  Oh!  Well, uh, it looks like we've had him all along!  Who knew?"  *poo-eating grin*

Hey!  If Sen. Shrillary can lose some FBI documents in her office for a number of years, it's not much more difficult to lose a prisoner on the OTHER side of the world.  *grin*
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Planted question, my @SS! Her campaign is circling-the-drain, and this "leak" is supposed to help her!

The reason Hitlary's campaign is making a big DEAL about this is that she fears the truth being revealed with her inability to decide one way or the other about giving drivers' licences to illegals in NY!  THIS is what forced her campaign into damage-control mode!  The campaign will distract the media with this "planted" question and people's memory of her "flip flopping" like Kerry did before he didn't do it will fade with time.

Well, that is how it MAY have worked when Billy Bob ran BOTH times back in '92 and '96, but A LOT has happened since then.  YOUTUBE is at the top of MY list of changes since those elections.  So, the collective's memory may not be fading as fast as Hitlary hopes it will.

This "planted" question was HARDLY a question!  It was some babble about AGW!  Who cares?  In ten years things will be BACK to normal, and the AGW types will be trying to take ALL the credit for doing NOTHING!

It's a win-win situation for them, however!  If things get better, i.e. the atmosphere chills, they get credit because they will take credit for martialling the people to "fight the issue!"  If the atmosphere gets "warmer," they STILL get credit for being "right" about the prediction!  *shrug*  If you are an AGW type, you REALLY can't paint yourself into a corner!  *laughter*
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Why not put the Missle Defense System (MDS) in Japan of all places?

If you ask me, JAPAN is the place to put the Missle Defense System (MDS).

It's a neighbor to North Korea is the main issue, but maybe there is an agreement with the Kim Jong Mentally Ill there to stay OUT of his business since he has decided, just recently, to shut down his nuclear reactor, but we've heard all this before from him.

Japan is not really in the neighborhood of the Middle East, so it may not be so effective against anything launched from Iran, were Iran's Ahmed-the-nutjob nuts enough to launch from the State of Iran.  So maybe that wouldn't work. 

Well, when my tiny brain FIRST considered the idea of asking the Japanese to serve as a launch site for these purely defensive missles, it made a lot of sense.  Now that the BACK of my brain has caught up to the front of my brain, the idea has dimmed a bit.  Granted, they would STILL be in Putin's backyard, but jeez!!!  His country is 13 time zones wide.  EVERYTHING, in Asia, is close to Mother Russia!  *laughter*

We look into installing these babies in Eastern Europe, and Putin throws a fit!  They may not do us too much good in Western Europe for a couple of reasons one, the MDS launch site would be too far down range of the offensive missles' launch site to make much of a difference and for the MDS to be able to catch up with the perp's missle to destroy it and two, the ninnies in France would want to paint or decorate it so that they can hold a "peace" festival around the MDS launch site.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Who was Conservatives' Reagan BEFORE Reagan?

This comic cracks me up!  The media are out there telling us that we NEED a new Reagan.  *dismissive wave*  Since GWB has proved himself to be NO REAGAN, according to what the media tell us, and none of the potential candidates on our side seems to be a NEW Reagan from THEIR perspective.
 
Well, let me ask this of you.  Who was our Reagan BEFORE there was a Reagan?  Had the media had their way, there wouldn't BE a Reagan, and these goons in the media want us to pick a Reagan before the elections so that they can rip him/her a new one BEFORE the election so that he/she looks as bad as possible so that the media can do the skewering they feel they need to do to "even the playing field."  We "conservatives" will just give up and stay home.
 
This is balderdash!  Again, who was our Ronald Reagan BEFORE there was a Ronald Reagan?  The media had kicked and bruised the memory of Richard Nixon such that only a fool embraced him at the end of the '70s!  This fool would NEVER get elected were he to embrace Nixon, and the media made sure of this.
 
So, all this media hoopla about "Who is the next Reagan?" is balderdash - B.S. for the more pedestrian among us.  The media are just upset that they haven't been able to trash Reagan's memory in the years since GHWB's election in '88 like they did to Nixon, and this is a Quixiotic effort to trash conservative windmills.
 
 
 
 
 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Where were these Gomers while Saddam killed his OWN people?



Good Lord!  This woman with the paint on her hands accosts Sec. Rice and claims that SHE is responsible for the "deaths of Iraqis."

Where were these people when Saddam was tossing innocents into shredders head first to keep his people at bay?  She is a Code Pink maroon.  You can see this from what you can read on her shirt just below her right arm.  What a bunch of goons these people are!  It would have been fun to have seen Condi take down this woman with a judo punch!  No idea if she KNOWS judo, but it would be fun to see her take down maroons like these!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Where are the French?

It dawned on me today that we need the French!

Here's why!  We need French to convince the people of Saudi Arabia that they can make it on their own sans the ruling family that has kept the country in its shadows for SO many years!

Would this be a clean break?  Not likely.  You would have the Islamists poking up their heads and pushing the people to embrace Islamofacism.  By then, maybe, we'll have the democracies in Iraq and Afghanistan working well and influencing thought among Arabs and Persians in the area also aiding to illustrate to the Saudi people that they CAN make it on their own.

Again, the forms of democracy that these two countries embrace may be NOTHING like what we embrace here in the States.  They MAY be independent from one another.  Who knows?  Only time will tell!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Dem Leaders Realize New Source of Income!

So!  Harry Reid's letter to Rush Limbaugh's broadcasting partner is about to be sold to the highest bidder for a tad more than $2 million.

This MUST have the Dims seeing green because from their perspective it is their signatures only on this document that is fetching it all this money!  They see themselves as modern-day signers of the Declaration of Independence!

In fact, this is what they MAY do!  What they will do is draft a "new" Declaration of Independence that puts things into the "proper" order from THEIR perspective.  Then ALL the members of the Dimocratic senate will sign this document thinking that it will make them famous. 

None of them realizes that it was Harry's efforts to snub a private citizen with the power of the Senate that makes this document so valuable - not the signatures, but their eyes are seeing only the green!  So trying to redirect them will be fruitless.

My hope is that this document makes a national tour around the time of the elections in '08 because you would see me paying a ticket price to get a close look at this document behind some protective glass, of course.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

If you own stock in a company that sells lead (Pb), SELL!!!!!

Good Lord!

Everyone is going ape-sh*t over lead!

The Chinese, according to the media, are pumping it into EVERYTHING they're manufacturing and selling to us: baby toys and paint are the items that are receiving the most attenion these days!  All you parents out there need to do is to teach your children not to lick their toys and to wash their hands AFTER they are done playing with the toys, and EVERYTHING would be fine!  The lead content wouldn't be a concern for you or your kid at all, but the media don't want you to be a responsible parent who teaches his/her kid to wash his/her hands.  We must ALL be dirty (equal) in the eyes of the media.

NOW the latest mole to pop its head out of the machine is lipstick!  The wife explained this morning that she has known for YEARS that lipstick contained lead and that she knew how to detect the lead in the lipstick as well.  Well, that meant castigating her for FAILING to tell me early enough so that we could put a video on YouTube to show everyone else, here the Western World at least, how one goes about this.

You can find it on YouTube if you search on lipstick and lead.  There will be dozens more videos by now anyway!  The wife showed me first-hand how to do this as well, confirming what the video illustrated.  The good news is that it took longer for her lipstick to turn darker than it did for the lip poison the person in the video used to turn darker in a similar manner.  *laughter*

So, if one of the companies for which you own stock is known to sell lead, SELL IT!!!  Get out of there!  *laughter*
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Who was Reagan BEFORE there was a Reagan?

What irks me these days is what is passing for "journalism" with the accent on "journal" in the term.

Most in the media are asking everyone,

"Who is the next Reagan?"

Well, let me remind you of the election in '80.  Granted, back then, you would have seen me only knee high to a grasshopper, but was there anyone looking for a "Reagan" in '80?  Nope!  Back then, the only lighthouse conservatives had in politics was Richard Nixon, and the media dimmed the intensity of his lighthouse SO much that none of the conservatives back then DARED to use him as a landmark!  Doing so meant becoming "Lost at Sea!"

The media have TRIED to do the same thing with Reagan to diminish the intensity of his light some, since his death only some years ago.  For example, they extrapolated his Alzheimer's back to when he was serving in office by saying, more or less, "look how much he is suffering from Alzheimer's at the end.  If he is suffering THIS much NOW, how much could it have affected him during his presidency?"  Granted, the media didn't SAY this literally, but the insinuations were there.

So they would insinutate further that we conservatives don't need to use Mr. Reagan as our contemporary lighthouse because the light he provided for those eight years in the '80s was "dim by reasons of illness."

Bring it on, pantywaists!  ONE of our guys will get us closer to the promised land. 

Back in the '80s, we conservatives didn't have FNC, or as the the other side like to call it "Faux News Channel."  They are so smart with THAT comment and the Gen. "Betrayus" comment too.  Is THIS all they have in their quivers?  Come on, guys and gals of the other side!  Can't you do better than this?  Sure!  We have fun, for example, with the name Sandy Burglar (Berger), but we don't make a political movement (e.g. Moveon.org) out of it, and there are court documents and confessions involving said burglar that the play on his name is VALID!!!  There is NOTHING that Petraeus has done as a commanding officer that gives us ANY motivation to call him a traitor, yet this is THEIR accusation!

What would kill me is to learn Sandy's real name is Sam Berger.  THEN it is SO easy to make the jump from Sam Berger to the Ham Burglar!  Now, THAT would be a funny revelation.

This reminds me SO much of my days as a boy scout!  In my troop back then we had a cabal of about four or five scouts who took it upon themselves, like the Dims of today, to make EVERYONE else's life as a scout in that troop as miserable as possible.  Two of these characters were brothers, and their father served as our troop's scoutmaster for many of the years that saw me participating with the troop until reaching the rank of Eagle Scout and moving on to a local sea scout post instead of the scout troop.

This little cabal kept to itself when it could.  They found themselves spread among the patrols, i.e. they did not participate all in ONE patrol, but they were nothing but a bunch of crybabies.  If they cried loudly enough, one of the fathers or even the scoutmaster himself would come to their aid.  It was pathetic.  My younger brother, who was also in the troop and the last of FOUR Eagle Scouts in my family, had to deal with them more than I because the elder brother of this pair was the same age as my younger brother.

Anyway, the dems of today have taken a shine to this attitude that these fellow scouts seemed to embrace 25 years ago.  They were nothing but crybabies back then, and the dems are nothing but crybabies today!  John Kerry emboddies this attitude to a "T."  Nothing but a crybaby whom somebody always needs to help.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Mullahs want the moolah! Here is the issue with Islam!

This dawned on me a couple of days ago with my participation in Yahoo Answers!  (YA!).  Someone posed the question as to why the Taliban allow their members to KILL other members of the Taliban sans any issue, more or less.  His grammar was a little suspect, but that is to be ignored in this posting.  Below is a link to the YA! page.

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AuYAShYnjvpAVLiXN8U1dHHty6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20071001060738AAxJYhX&show=7#profile-info-e996e1e2b74fcdcce913c186f8c9cfb5aa

One of the first answers was REALLY close and quite valid.  The Taliban are allowed to kill one another because they are members of a society, or cult, if you will, that permits any muslim to kill another muslim sans any issues being raised by the mosque, the governing body for the muslim faith.  My explanation goes into some detail as to WHY this is the case.  This revelation came to my tiny brain on its own and it made PERFECT sense.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive